User talk:TwoWings

• Archived messages about my pictures used outside of Wikimedia projects
• Other archived talks

• NB: I confirm I'm the author of the edits under the following IPs (last update: --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)):
  • 86.67.47.199
  • 89.90.8.129

Photo supprimée

Bonsoir,

J'ai supprimé File:Ticky Holgado's tomb.JPG. Le sculpteur du buste est probablement toujours en vie. ~Pyb (talk) 22:14, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Horse-transport-sign.JPG

Hi. Please understand that adding Category:Horse transport is an unneeded double-categorizing as Category:Horse-related road signs is directly contained in Category:Horse transport :). We aim at being as specific as possible in selecting categories, if you take a look at the tree of Category:Horse transport (or any other) you'll notice the relations between the subcats and your selections will be much more refined next time. (similarly applies to Category:Videos_of_nudity) Regardz! Orrlingtalk 18:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Horse-related road signs

Hi. :) The way things work with the categories has been explained to you, including emphasis on the rationale behind why horse-related road signs are also related to horse-transport. You may call for arbitration if you're unhappy with it, but please don't engage in edit-fights, which only harms our readers (and leads to little point). - The prevalent classification method here is based much on CommonSense, triple-meaning. Regards, Orrlingtalk 21:19, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

I did explain to YOU why the categorizing is not right for that matter. Don't try to tell me you want to teach me how categorizing works (I'm older than you as a Commons user and I've fixed many categorizing and overcategorizing problems). Instead of asking me not to engage in edit-fight you should at least try to think and start with an answer/comment considering the example I mentionned to you. This file is a road sign showing a horse that has nothing to do with horse transport, and there are other examples such as File:Attention chevaux 1.jpg, File:CH-Gefahrensignal-Tiere (2).svg, File:Trnová, pozor přechod pro koně.jpg or File:Singapore Road Signs - Warning Sign - Animals.svg (those road signs warn that you can meet animals - and mainly horses - ahead and that yo have to be careful, but they don't say if these horses are used as a transport mean - it can also be, for instance, horses bred for meat). Therefore [:Category:Horse-related road signs]] also concerns signs that are not dealing with horse transport, so it cannot be a subcat of Category:Horse transport. QED. So now please try to build a more logical category tree (as I suggested above) instead of reverting me. Thanks in advance. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:35, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Cat is watching you.

A cat.

The Fly 21:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Forez-info

Salut
J'ai finalement fait une page groupée, ici Commons:Deletion requests/Wikijoe upload Forez-info, devant le nombre ! Tu peux y donner ton avis. Celui laissé sur Commons:Deletion requests/File:Musée de la mine.jpg‎ ne sera pas lu, la page est désormais orpheline. ----MGuf (d) 18:35, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

ilove you

Hazem jridi (talk) 11:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Bonjour TwoWings, J'aimerais utiliser ta photo "Big rusty boat in Moynaq" pour la couverture d'un roman traitant de l'assèchement de la mer d'Aral. Quelles sont les mentions à insérer? Merci! Maki71 (talk) 08:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks very much

Thanks very much for your categorization help for images related to Category:South Park (cartoon), much appreciated, -- Cirt (talk) 22:59, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

©

Bonjour. Je ne suis pas sûr que votre demande de citer votre nom avec le sigle "©" (qui signifie "copyright") soit compatible avec les licences de type "Creative Commons"... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:07, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour, je vous remercie de vous inquiéter pour moi. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

foto Life_in_Manastirea_Humorului.jpg

Hereby I want to ask you friendly, if we can use your foto on wikimedia Life_in_Manastirea_Humorului.jpg for a publication within an equestrian journal. My mail adress is thomas.druml@gmx.at

Wang Du

Bonjour. I have some questions on the page: Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:Wang Du, World Markets 2004. MAC Lyon. 1.jpg . Kind regards. Ismoon (talk) 14:42, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

I made an appointement with the "iconographe" at the Musée d'Art Contemporain de Lyon, tomorrow, for asking if a license is possible in the case of the work of Wang Du, in front of the museum but in the park. Ismoon (talk) 14:44, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Abu Ghraib 70.jpg

I have removed 2 categories from that image, as their addition is frankly in bad taste. Flashing ones breasts is an entirely different concept to being forced to lift ones top to show their breasts; in fact it's a vile disgusting act on the part of the perpetrators of the abuse in Abu Ghraib, and we shouldn't be mixing this up with the exhibitionist act. I've also remove the prostitute category, as it is entirely heresay, and even if she was a prostitute, it isn't relevant to this particular photo. I'm not attacking you at all, but I would ask that we use a little common sense with such images. russavia (talk) 13:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Opéra de Lyon et Place Pradel - Guignol.jpg

Bonjour,

ce fichier a déjà fait l'objet d'une délation en 2011 ... et conservé ... Dois-je espérer une nouvelle requête tous les 2 ans ?

Cordialement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GO69 (talk • contribs)

"Délation". Les grands mots. Tu n'as pas l'impression d'exagérer un peu ?

Bref, passons sur ta réaction désagréable et disproportionnée.

Il se trouve tout d'abord que je ne connaissais pas la précédente demande. Ensuite, il se trouve aussi qu'il s'agissait d'une demande de suppression groupée et ce style de demande produit souvent quelques ratés pour certains fichiers.

Cette photo en particulier pose doublement problème car elle se focalise sur une sculpture trop récente pour être libre de droits et l'arrière-plan est essentiellement composé de la partie récente de l'Opéra de Lyon, donc une architecture qu'on ne peut pas utiliser librement de cette façon. Les plans larges de l'Opéra sont acceptables car il est quasi impossible de photographier la partie ancienne sans montrer la partie moderne, donc on peut considéré que la partie récente est alors de minimis, ce qui n'est pas le cas quand une photo montre majoritairement la partie moderne. Bref, je sais que c'est frustrant de voir disparaître des photos qu'on a prises et chargées sur Commons (je connais ça...), mais il faut savoir accepter les règles et contraintes d'un projet quand on y participe. Désolé, donc, mais ta photo risque fortement d'être supprimée. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Monsieur,

visiblement nous ne partageons pas les mêmes règles élémentaires de politesse et de courtoisie, mais peut-être sont-elles proscrites sur Commons à moins que vous ne vous croyez autorisé à vous en affranchir ... En tête, formule de politesse, salutation, vouvoiement ... Passons.

Où je réponds de manière concise, un tantinet espièglement, ne parlant que d'un fichier, vous vous pensez autorisé à porter des jugements de valeur sur une personne vous étant parfaitement étrangère (réaction désagréable, disproportionnée ...), mais peut-être ne souffrez-vous pas la contradiction ?

Guignol au premier plan: le fragment d'une sculpture beaucoup plus importante qui, combiné avec le premier étage de Chenavard et Pollet, avec le toit de Nouvel, permettait un travail intéressant sur les obliques ... Passons, intrinsèquement les fichier chargés sur Commons ne sauraient à priori avoir de valeur artistique, si minime soit-elle.

Peu me chaut que ce fichier soit supprimé. En revanche, je trouve parfaitement inacceptable que vous sous-entendiez que quiconque ose vous faire remarquer que votre requête a déjà un précédent méconnaît sciemment les règles fondamentales de commons ("il faut savoir accepter les règles et contraintes d'un projet quand on y participe"), s'en affranchit délibérément et soit de-facto un mauvais-joueur. Vous ne faîtes guère crédit à votre interlocuteur de désintéressement et de désir de partage libre des connaissances. Sachez que Wikipédia n'est pour moi ni un blog pour polémiquer ni une encyclopédie propre à satisfaire mon égo.

Quant à la précédente demande en suppression, il ne tenait qu'à vous de vous en enquérir avant de la renouveler.

Si deletion est un faux-ami de la langue anglaise, ce que je sais à présent grâce à vous et ce dont je vous remercie, il me semble que les intentions qui conduisent à proposer à la suppression des fichiers ne sont pas forcément toujours amicales.

Je crois qu'il eut été beaucoup plus simple de me laisser un message un rien plus cordial, un peu moins invectivant, tout en conservant l'argumentaire technique de deuxième partie au demeurant très intéressant.

J'espère que vous comprendrez que se retrancher derrière l'application subjective et draconienne de lois et règlements, dont tout un chacun ne peut avoir qu'une lecture particulière et univoque, ou s'ériger en donneur de leçon n'est pas de nature à encourager la contribution et la coopération du plus grand nombre. Je ne crois pas d'ailleurs que l'on puisse faire montre de véritable pédagogie en qualifiant d'entrée de jeu ses interlocuteurs de désagréables et en les suspectant de mauvaise foi.

Espérant vous rencontrer à l'avenir sur Commons ou Wikipédia dans un climat plus serein, je vous renouvelle mes cordiales salutations. --GO69 (talk) 16:13, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Je ne vais pas trop perdre mon temps avec quelqu'un qui semble avoir une haute estime de lui-même et s'amuse à donner des leçons sans observer ses propres torts. Mais je voudrais quand même réagir rapidement à certains aspects de votre message car j'aimerais que vous compreniez :

1) que c'est culotté de donner des leçons de savoir-vivre quand on accuse quelqu'un avec des mots aussi disproportionnés que "délation" ; c'est donc aussi une contradiction, pour reprendre votre propos : on n'utilise pas ce genre de mot si on souhaite lancer une discussion cordiale ! (et surtout on ne se plaint pas de la réaction après coup !)

2) que, lorsqu'on prétend ne pas être touché par l'éventuelle suppression d'un fichier et ne pas vouloir utiliser Wikimedia comme un outil de polémique, on ne laisse pas ce genre de message et on se focalise sur les faits et le sujet concerné (en l'occurrence : est-ce que la photo proposée à la suppression le mérite ou non ?... avec des arguments, etc.)

3) vous trouverez finalement peu de contributeurs qui passeront du temps à expliquer leur démarche, surtout après de tels messages, donc merci de ne plus me donner de leçon de "pédagogie"

4) je n'ai jamais remis en cause ni la qualité du cliché ni son utilité, mais seulement le non-respect des règles de Wikimedia Commons (et accessoirement des lois)

5) Chaque utilisateur des projets Wikimedia est le garant du respect des règles, des objectifs et du bon fonctionnement de ces mêmes projets. Or, le non-respect des copyright et autres droits d'auteur est une chose sur laquelle il faut veiller constamment et surtout pas attendre d'éventuelles "plaintes" ! Imaginez si on vous prend au mot et au pied de la lettre : on n'a qu'à importer n'importe quelle œuvre (des Picasso, des extraits de film de Spielberg, des caricatures de Plantu, des romans in extenso de Stephen King, que sais-je encore...) et les garder jusqu'à ce que quelqu'un s'en plaigne ? Non. Cela ne fonctionne pas comme ça ici. Le risque de cette dérive, d'ailleurs, serait d'avoir très facilement des plaintes des artistes les plus connus alors que des artistes qui n'auraient pas les mêmes moyens ni les mêmes "fan-clubs" verraient leurs œuvres "pillées" allègrement et utilisées de façon illégale sous prétexte que personne ne s'en plaint ! Inacceptable. Il faut vous souvenir d'une chose essentielle : le pourquoi de ces différentes règles. Les projets de Wikimedia doivent proposer un contenu librement utilisable y compris commercialement (n'importe qui peut donc essayer de vendre des images de Commons ou des articles de Wikipédia, tant qu'il mentionne correctement les auteurs et les licences qui vont avec). Ce qui veut dire que quelqu'un peut se croire libre de vendre la reproduction d'une œuvre qu'il trouve sur Commons s'il fait confiance aveuglément au fait que sa présence sur ce site fait de cette œuvre une œuvre librement utilisable (vous me suivez ?). Conséquence : Wikimedia et, surtout, les utilisateurs qui importent ces fichiers, se rendent complices (involontairement ou volontairement selon les cas) d'un trafic illégal et d'un détournement du droit d'auteur. J'espère que vous comprends désormais qu'il ne s'agit donc pas de zèle de ma part ou d'une quelconque animosité envers vous, mais simplement de sérieux vis-à-vis des projets auxquels je (on) participe.

Cordialement. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Monsieur,

dans la mesure où vous vous honorez des messages épidermiques dont vous avez bien voulu me gratifier, il paraît plus que légitime qu'ils figurent sur votre page utilisateur. Tout un chacun pourra être à même d'apprécier la douceur de vos propos totalement dénués d'animosité et de mépris. Définitivement, je ne partage pas votre conception très particulière de la bienveillance et de la courtoisie dont devraient visiblement être empreints selon vous les échanges entre contributeurs. Inutile de perdre votre précieux temps à me répondre, en votre nom et celui si appropriable de l'ensemble des contributeurs. Encore et toujours cordialement.--GO69 (talk) 20:44, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

a heads-up

In 2011 you participated in Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb_(de-adminship 2). That discussion ended with User:Jcb losing his administrator privileges.

This note is to inform you that User:Odder proposed Jcb have unconconditional access to administrator privileges restored.

Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (readmin) is scheduled to close on May 20th.

Cheers Geo Swan (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:Ethnographic_topless_adolescent_girls

Category:Ethnographic_topless_adolescent_girls has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 00:17, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Fellation Tracy and Rick-3.jpg

File:Fellation Tracy and Rick-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Scott • talk 13:23, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, TwoWings. You have new messages at Nicoli Maege's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Using your picture as a background image for a catalog

Hi,

We would like to inform you that, with your permission, we will be using your (modified) image of the Notre Dame candles as a background image of the cover of our product catalog http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Candles_Notre_Dame.JPG# Please confirm that we do have the permission to use it. If you would prefer to contact us directly, please email mario@indioproducts.com. Thank you!

Indio Products

File:Joker reading bad news!.JPG

Hello TwoWings!

With your permission, I'd like to use your picture (with attribution) as an illustration of marketing in a conference presentation on the management of creative risk. I'd be grateful for a short response at florianschwarzer [at] gmx [dot] net.

Thanks for your contributions!

Demande de suppression de plusieurs photographies concernant la ville de Brest dont je suis l'auteur

Je suis l'auteur de plusieurs photos d'architecture récente concernant Brest dont File:ESC Brest.JPG ; File:017 L'église de Bellevue.jpg ; etc.. Ces bâtiments sont des bâtiments publics ou accessibles au public, visibles par tous ; je ne comprend pas qu'on ne puisse pas les mattre sur wikimedia commons sous prétexte qu'ils sont récents. Amicalement.

Henri MOREAU 04:41, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

humans by chronological age

thanks for all your work! it is good to finally have somebody else working on this project

Lx 121 (talk) 11:32, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Mais pourquoi diable ?

Salut,
Pourquoi proposes-tu cette image à la suppression File:Avant match - vue de Gerland depuis le virage sud.jpg pour le motif discutable que l'architecte n'est pas mort depuis plus de 70 ans (alors même que le bâtiment lui-même et son architecture sont peu identifiables) et pas celle-ci qui dévoile autant (ou aussi peu) du bâtiment File:Stade-Gerland-RWC2007.JPG. On se demande ... --Aga (d) 09:13, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Image use

Hi! I'm Matt, an image and photo layout editor from Cracked.com. In an upcoming article about abandoned places, we're using your image of a car in Oradour (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Car_in_Oradour-sur-Glane4.jpg), and to honor your very reasonable permission request I'm dropping a in to let you know! The article, tentatively titled "6 Places You Can Visit The Post-Apoclaypse (Today!)", should run in about a week.

Mauvais crédit

Bonjour !

Pour info, une de tes photos a été utilisée, mais ton pseudo est mal orthographié (et la licence, bah, euh, est partielle). Litlok (talk) 11:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Edit fight

Before repeating for the fourth time making unsustainable modifications in Category:Sex and Category:Sexuality, you'll need to have editors consensing with your proposal, and as long as your proposal is rejected, you should not try to carry it out notwithstanding. This is how it works here on Wiki Commons. Orrlingtalk 15:58, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Before giving lessons to someone, you have to follow the same lessons yourself.

1. If you read Category talk:Sex in advertising, your point of view seems quite isolated.
2. The Wikipedia categories about the same topics existed before the Commons categories (and the meanings of these words preexisted to WP cats !). So please apply the same logic... and if you're not happy with that, start a discussion about it on WP. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:20, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

I posted a message at the village pump in order to have other opinions because at present the discussion between us can't lead anywhere. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:32, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

I appreciate this. I'll participate, as long as you maintain a decent and collegiative tone of speech. Thank you. Orrlingtalk 17:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Try to maintain that too ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

The important thing to remember is that whenever sex is involved, ensure you get consent. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Lol. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:27, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Jean_skirts

Category:Jean_skirts has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

-- Tuválkin ✉ 00:07, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Metro-Tashkent.jpg

Hi TwoWings. Some of your files are listed in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. Could you please have a look and try to fix the syntax errors? Thank you. Leyo 13:21, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Renommer ? dans Commons

Bonjour,

Je suppose que tu n'es pas spécialiste, mais à tout hasard : Le dossier Category:Pottery of ancient China me semble trop flou, certains y ont déposé des images relevant d'époques sans relation aucune avec les autres. La majorité se rapporte au néolithique de la Chine. Ne pourrait-on pas le renommer : Category:Neolithic Pottery of China ? et dans ce cas comment faire ? Je me charge alors de reclasser les images qui n'entreraient plus dans ce dossier. Ismoon (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Bon, j'ai trouvé une solution simple et pratique. Forget it. Ismoon (talk) 15:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Chartreuse-fake-2.jpg

And also:

• File:Chartreuse-fake-3.jpg
• File:Chartreuse-fake-4.jpg
• File:Chartreuse-fake.jpg

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/TwoWings⧽: العربية, български, Deutsch, English, ‎français, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎മലയാളം, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska, اردو, 中文

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 7 February 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Jacquet aux César 2014

Salut. Dis-moi, tu n'aurais pas pris en photo Luc Jacquet lors des César 2014, par hasard ? Parce qu'on n'a aucune photo de lui sur Commons... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:11, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Hé non, aucun des deux. Désolé. JJ Georges (talk) 16:15, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Heu, pardon, j'ai eu la berlue... C'est parce que j'avais demandé au photographe s'il avait une photo de quelqu'un d'autre, et du coup j'ai mélangé la demande au sujet de Luc Jacquet et ma propre demande. (La fatigue... En tout cas, il n'avait pas de photo de Luc Jacquet, ni de la personne dont je cherchais une image, voilà !) JJ Georges (talk) 10:11, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

File:1 - Un électeur vote pour Ali Benflis 2014.jpg

Bonjour, il y a quoi comme problème avec cette photo ?? je l`es pris moi même, et elle est normalement légale sur commons.--Vikoula5 (talk) 12:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Je vous comprend mais il y a une catégorie avec les bulletins de vote avec des photos de politiciens.--Vikoula5 (talk) 12:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Je veux dire que, cette photo et la photo d`un bulletin de vote tout comme dans la catégorie Category:Ballot_papers dans la quelle il y a des photos de bulletins de vote avec les photos des politiciens tout comme celle de Benflis. Et si on les supprime autant de faire ça avec les autres bulletins. --Vikoula5 (talk) 13:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Sepia version

My intention was to increase an encyclopedic value of the image. Former 'sepia' version is not an original one as this 'sepia' visual effect was digitally created using color bands digital shifting. That is why an originally black&white photo was reverted to the original b&w scheme. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 15:16, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Sepia (orange) version is a result of the erroneous automatic white balance. The same effect is at your selfie you've located at your own page here. Your camera shifted the colours, not you. But original colours were b&w as it is a b&w photo. But I can just revert the image to the 'camera' orange version. I've uploaded a new color version with white balance correction, this version is closer the original, I guess. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 15:36, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

You tell the orange color is 'sepia'? No, this intensive color is present when the automatic white balance fails. Your selfie File:TwoWings_and_his_ghost.JPG demonstrates erroneous automatic white balance. Or your face really has this orange colour. So does new image version satisfies you? If not I can revert the orange version. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 16:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Ok, now we know the orange version origins. But does current colour (a new, not b&w) version better? Or it is not sepia enough yet? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 21:45, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

But Lybian image is not an original 'sepia', I guess. It is much more natural version with better resolution here. Generally too intensive 'sepia' is usually an electronic/digital effect. Sepia is not a 'natural' colour of the original b&w photos but was generated using chemical processing of the original b&w copy. But 'sepia' processed copies were more stable that is why these copies survived, I guess [1]. Current colour version post white balance correction looks like sepia toned. But if you (or me) would increase color saturation - will this saturated version be more close to the original museum photo colour? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 00:00, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

I've uploaded better version of the Lybian image (from ebay). The reason of converting 'orange' image was to make ancient picture more clear as contrasted b&w version reflects original b&w nature of the Baku city picture. You, me, everybody can revert to 'orange' erroneous white balance version. I'm not sure this 'orange' version encyclopedic values for the Wikipedia are better then b&w version, as we don't need preserve artistic colouring (as it was with your selfie where colour distortion is making funny effect and so it is an artistic trick) but we need a picture of Baku - not less not more. We are storing imagery at Commons with the purpose to use these files in Wikipedia, isn't it? So I'm not sure we need a "raw" image with colour distortions. You could make colour corrections before image uploading, but I've done this for you. Your reaction was emotional, but nothing personal - just Wikipedia. Colour adjustments of the images is my routine job at Commons. And I will continue this work. But if you personally want reversion all my corrections - you can do that. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:28, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

You are missing being an uploader and an author. Original photo of Baku city is not your nor mine, you've made a photocopy (thank you for that activity, yes, thank you), this photocopy of the plain image has no artistic values, isn't it? And your photocamera (not you, but it) made this photocopy with significant colour distortions. I've corrected colour balance and contrast of this photocopy.

Your topic with your own artistic photopicture is very different as you are an artist, the author of this artistic picture. That is why you've uploaded your piece of art with the special licensing. But the photo of Baku made in 1870 has its author, but this author is unknown and died (may be) a century ago. That is why the license is completely free, you see. So everybody at Commons and everywhere can do everything with the image you uploaded. But I've done the colour and contrast corrections with the aim to make this image more clear. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:17, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

You, me, everybody anytime can process b&w paper copy of a photograph to the 'sepia' colors, so your opinion abut unknown author will to make a paper copy of a photoimage of the street being processed to 'sepia' color is possible. But 'sepia' was not an artistic trick, but this was a routine technology with the aim to protect paper photocopy from the time destroying. That is why 'sepia' images better survived. It was a routine standard processing, not an art. It was no intentions to add any new artistic values. But now 'sepia' processing is an artistic trick. But the street image originally was b&w as it was the only type of photography at this period, you see. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 20:52, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

The postcard we are discussing abut is not a piece of art but just a photograph of the street. This postcard is interesting for as a depicture of the XIX century Baku city. But your photocamera significantly changed color, you see. What we need more: a false 'orange' colored digital photocopy or a colour-corrected digital photo? Just now this photo is present at the colour corrected form, not b&w colour scheme. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:35, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Here the alternative issue of the same photo at a post card. And we know the author К.Г.Папамоскич (K.G. Papamoskich). Bogomolov.PL (talk) 15:35, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

We are sure now with not 'sepia' nature of the colour at both postcards - this yellow colorization is an effect of the paper ageing, not any 'sepia'. Old paper becomes yellow, you see. And Papamoskich, I've checked in the net, is an publishing house owner, not photographer.

And with replacing of the old ('your') photo with a 'new' one. The second one has full extend (we can see a dog at the bottom edge) and that is why it is preferable. But if we need just an old picture of the same spot of Baku - we can use this postcard with better quality image and shot from higher point. But we have a lot of old photos of Baku here and here, and here and here and here and here and here (real photos). Bogomolov.PL (talk) 18:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

A postcard cannot be a 'sepia' colored as this kind of images were made using regular printing technologies. So if colors look 'sepia' they are not 'sepia' as 'sepia' is a technology of a photoimage processing, you see. Photoimage in a chemical sense - created using silver. But if we see a brownish print at the regular paper it can be an effect of the ageing or the brown ink was used.

I why you are not assuming a good faith? When I'm emphasizing that a paper can change a colour? I can not understand this, so I'm so sad. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 20:42, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

File:SquawManPoster.jpg

File:SquawManPoster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Racconish^✉ 10:17, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Felix2 (by Peter Klashorst).jpg

File:Felix2 (by Peter Klashorst).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.

 

Vera ^(talk) 20:47, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Felix2 (by Peter Klashorst).jpg

File:Felix2 (by Peter Klashorst).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 21:22, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Women in the revolution.jpg

Yours sincerely, Discasto _{talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis} 12:40, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Chrono Guerre Froide Dirigeants.jpg : emploi du terme "empire" ou "bloc"

Bonjour. Afin de respecter la neutralité dans l'usage de File:Chrono Guerre Froide Dirigeants.jpg sur WP, pourrais-tu remplacer le terme "Empire" par "Bloc", qui est plus neutre. Merci. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour, je me suis longuement posé la question lors de la création de cette frise qui a fait partie d'un travail de revue en profondeur de l'article relatif à la guerre froide. Cette notion d'empire, comme celle de bloc, apparaît dans de nombreux ouvrages des historiens américains ou français consacrés à la guerre froide (listés pour les plus "classiques" d'entre eux dans cet article) et représente sans doute mieux le caractère hégémonique et plus ou moins subi de la domination des États-Unis et de l'Union soviétique sur les pays dans leur mouvance. La discussion me semble donc légitime, mais le choix final entre les deux termes pas évident. Ce serait intéressant de recueillir d'autres avis. Concernant la neutralité, elle me semble respectée dès lors que le même terme "empire" est utilisé tant pour les États-Unis que pour l'Union soviétique. Concernant l'orthographe, la majuscule ne s'impose pas pour ce terme "empire", et je me propose donc de la remplacer par une minuscule sans précipiter une décision sur le changement de terme. Denis-Paul Bourg (talk) 07:31, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Attention, je ne dis pas que l'utilisation du mot "empire" est illégitime, et je ne suis pas non plus en train de dénigrer le travail des spécialistes qui emploient ce mot. Ceci dit, ces mêmes spécialistes ne sont pas forcément guidés/contraints par la même nécessité de neutralité que nous le sommes sur WP. De même, il me semble (mais je peux me tromper) que les USA et l'URSS employaient le terme "empire"... pour désigner l'ennemi et non pour désigner eux-mêmes. Dans tous les cas, le mot "empire" est trop connoté et porte en lui un jugement et/ou un positionnement idéologique. Inversement, je ne vois pas en quoi le terme "bloc" induit un problème de neutralité. Il est donc largement préférable dans le cadre d'une encyclopédie qui chercher à respecter au mieux la neutralité (je dis bien "au mieux" car la neutralité stricte et totale n'est pas toujours possible, notamment quand il s'agit d'Histoire ou de géopolitique !). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:59, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour, j'ai procédé à la modification que vous souhaitiez, moins pour des raisons de neutralité - car l'emploi symétrique du terme "empire" respecte cette notion - ou de réalité historique - car les historiens utilisent volontiers ce terme qui décrit mieux la manière dont les États-Unis et l'Union soviétique ont agi pendant cette période - que pour des raisons d'usage, le terme "bloc" étant en effet consacré dans le langage courant. Denis-Paul Bourg (talk) 17:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC).

Merci. Je pense que c'est effectivement plus raisonnable au moins d'un point de vue de l'usage (cf principe de moindre surprise sur WP).

Je persiste toutefois à penser que l'emploi du mot "empire" est connoté et donc moins neutre que "bloc" - rappelons qu'il y avait aussi des pays dits "non alignés" et l'emploi par eux du terme "empire" prend justement un aspect idéologique qui n'est pas présent dans le mot "bloc".

De la même manière, même si je ne conteste aucunement la pertinence de l'utilisation du terme "empire" par les historiens, je ne pense pas que tous les historiens utilisent ce terme et je pense que c'est réducteur d'analyser la Guerre froide avec une telle interprétation (tout comme il serait naïf de nier le côté effectivement impérial des deux pays). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Euh... Pourquoi ne vois-je aucun changement sur le fichier qui indique toujours "Empire" ?!... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Internal_structure_of_the_Statue_of_Liberty

Category:Internal_structure_of_the_Statue_of_Liberty has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jmabel ! talk 06:43, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Loic Varraut 2003.jpg

File:Loic Varraut 2003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Elfix 11:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Cour intérieure de l'Hôtel de ville de Paris

Hello, I'm sorry I didn't find any other way to contact you, however, I like very much your picture mentioned in the subjet, could you kindly confirm that I can use it. I would use it as background for a poster announcing a literary evening on European literature.

Thank you very much in advance, Rita

François Hollande ???

Thanks for your comment. At the time, I was mainly attempting to identify the 'aircraft', during which it seemed evidently some sort of political protest or demonstration. The face depiction looked likely to be someone such as Hollande with earlier hair cut and minus spectacles. You are welcome to remove his name, and/or replace it with a more likely candidate :-).PeterWD (talk) 09:55, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Avenue-de-France.jpg

Hi,
Before nominating an image for deletion, please go to the discussion page of the image. If you look to File talk:Avenue-de-France.jpg, you see that there was already a nomination for deletion on 12 april 2013 and that the decision was kept.
I agree that no-FoP in France is a very ennoying problem (I am French). But go rather to Category:Skyscrapers in La Defense, Category:20th-century sculptures in France, Category:21st-century sculptures in France. You will find some work to to. I did a few.
Regards. --Tangopaso (talk) 17:43, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Youna Dufournet GP.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Heurtoir Pérouges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments I wish it was a bit more symmetrical, but that may well be the door's fault. Otherwise QI for me. --El Grafo 12:59, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Gilles Muller London 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Not too sharp but sufficient quality. --Kreuzschnabel 09:56, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Fontaine Bartholdi - Glace 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --Billy69150 14:28, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Exposition charlie publicites.jpg

Bonjour. Je ne comprends rien à la motivation de cette suppression. Il me semble qu'il n'y a pas eu de débat, si ? Jean-no (talk) 22:01, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

@Jean-no: La motivation est la suivante : l'image se focalisait avant tout sur des oeuvres qui ne sont pas libres de droit. Voir Commons:Œuvre dérivée, Commons:De minimis/fr et Commons:Freedom of panorama/fr. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:27, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Bonnard

Merci. --Coyau (talk) 17:25, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Une petite question

Bonjour TwoWings,

Comme tu as l'air plus au courant que moi des lois et règlements, j'ai une petite question. Voilà, j'ai quelques photos de parties de caisses de vin en bois (un des six côtés de la caisse), avec par exemple cette inscription bien visible: Château Haut-Bailly, Cru exceptionnel, Grand Cru classé de Graves, 12 B Léognan G de 1973, puis-je poster ces photos, est-ce légal ? Je n'ai trouvé aucune photo de ce genre sur Commons, de là mon doute !

D'avance merci de ta réponse, cordialement --Jamain (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

@Jamain: tout dépend de la présence d'un logo, de sa complexité graphique et de son importance en termes de proportion de l'image. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:41, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Je viens d'en poster une avec un logo (si les deux lions au milieu sont considérés comme un logo) [2], qu'en penses-tu ? En fonction de cette photo (elle passe ou pas), j'aurai une idée pour la suite. J'en ai d'autres sans aucun logo, et certaines avec un logo un peu plus important ! Merci,--Jamain (talk) 15:11, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Je ne suis pas suffisamment spécialiste pour le certifier mais je pense que c'est acceptable. Surtout quand un vignoble est si ancien, ce qui laisse supposer que le logo/blason a de fortes chances d'être suffisamment ancien lui aussi. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Je te remercie pour la rapidité et la clarté de ta réponse. --Jamain (talk) 19:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Fw.:Category:Categories by posture

Its a flat list.--Allforrous 18:29, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Men_named_James

Category:Men_named_James has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Auntof6 (talk) 07:11, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Men_named_Raphael

Category:Men_named_Raphael has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Auntof6 (talk) 07:20, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Saint Étienne-Rue Philippon-SA01-20140127.jpg, etc.

When you nominate for deletion more than two or three closely related files, particularly if they are by the same uploader, please use a mass deletion request. COM:VFC makes this very easy -- certainly faster than placing 13 separate nominations. Also, it is easier to have a discussion in one place rather than 13, and easier for the closing Admin, as well. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: : sorry... and thanks for the advice. I'll read COM:VFC later (and before lauching any other DR, I promise). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ballgirl rolling the ball-RG2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments weak  Support . Great motionpicture --Hubertl 06:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ivanovic-Shvedova-Lenglen-RG2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:02, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Dustin Brown 12, 2015 Wimbledon Qualifying - Diliff.jpg

Hi TwoWings. You added the category 'Unidentified tennis players' to this image. Why do you think they're unidentified? It's clearly Dustin Brown on the right. Or are you referring to the other player in the photo? I'll update the information to identify both players and remove the category. Diliff (talk) 18:53, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

@Diliff: Of course I was referring to the other player ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Morts plus morts...

Merci !

Si tu savais comment c'est, de vivre avec sa parano jour et nuit et d'avoir à la maîtriser en permanence... mais bon, y'a pire ! Les schizophrénies collectives de l'humanité ou de tel ou tel groupe, c'est une autre paire de manches, et ça pourrait bien compromettre la survie de l'espèce... Au fait, des caricatures de cette série, j'en ai bien d'autres (jamais passées sur le net), et si j'en télécharge une, je te préviens. Bonne continuation, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 11:28, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ariane Ascaride - Brodeuses (2).jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ariane Ascaride - Brodeuses (2).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Jcb (talk) 15:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ariane Ascaride - Brodeuses.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ariane Ascaride - Brodeuses.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Jcb (talk) 15:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Brodeuses tournage.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Brodeuses tournage.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Jcb (talk) 15:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:E-Faucher-Brodeuses.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:E-Faucher-Brodeuses.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Jcb (talk) 15:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Next revert = block

I'm getting pissed by your actions. There is nothing to debate as the situation is clear. --Denniss (talk) 11:27, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Boomerang!--Elvey (talk) 01:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

@Elvey: ???? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Deleted content

Afrikaans | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | svenska | українська | +/−

---

Hello TwoWings,

the following content you uploaded is not free and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Ariane Ascaride - Brodeuses (2).jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files which can be used for any purpose, including:

• use in any work, regardless of content
• creation of derivative works
• commercial use
• free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload works you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

And also:

• File:Ariane Ascaride - Brodeuses.jpg
• File:Brodeuses tournage.jpg
• File:E-Faucher-Brodeuses.jpg

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 07:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Deleted content

Hi, Please explain this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Marvin_snorre_pointing.jpg

Originally uploaded to my English wiki user page, now its gone. I want it back.

-Snorre/Antwelm (talk) 14:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

@Snorre: I can't recall what this picture was about (and I don't have access to it, not being an admin). But I happened to think it was a derivative work and it was deleted for that reason. If you think it was a wrong decision, I suggest you ask the user who took the decision to delete it (INeverCry) or request its undeletion here. Regards. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

I'm not an administrator anymore, so I can't see this deleted image either, or answer any question about it. INeverCry 20:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Masturbating Amy.jpg

File:Masturbating Amy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RasabJacek (talk) 20:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Danielle upskirt.jpg

File:Danielle upskirt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ijon (talk) 12:04, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ejaculation after footjob.jpg

Yours sincerely, —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 19:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 352.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 352.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 379.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 379.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 637.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 637.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 344.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 344.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:33, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 034.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 034.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:39, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 243.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 243.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 442.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 442.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:42, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 445.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 445.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 440.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 440.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:43, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 439a.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 439a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 435.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 435.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 434.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 434.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20110218 0112 Beky Stevens.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20110218 0112 Beky Stevens.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Lap dance024 079.jpg

File:Lap dance024 079.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 426.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 426.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Masturbation on stage024 064.jpg

File:Masturbation on stage024 064.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 422.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 422.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Woman masturbated by man024 059.jpg

File:Woman masturbated by man024 059.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 13:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20091024 352.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20091024 352.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 14:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20091024 169.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20091024 169.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 14:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Nude man-erotic show024 106.jpg

File:Nude man-erotic show024 106.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20091024 202.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20091024 202.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 14:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20110218 1098 Christina Bella & Mya Diamond.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20110218 1098 Christina Bella & Mya Diamond.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 14:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20091024 161.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20091024 161.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fixpol (talk) 14:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Anal_balls_in_use

Category:Anal_balls_in_use has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

63.143.116.182 05:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Logs

Category:Logs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jmabel ! talk 15:05, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Playing (nude).jpg

File:Playing (nude).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Toni Müller (talk) 13:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:World_Artistic_Gymnastics_Championships

Category:World_Artistic_Gymnastics_Championships has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 22:15, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

my uploads

Can I get your opinion on my uploads I took? Thanks;) Chick1555 (talk) 10:10, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Source

Hi,

could you tell me, what was a source of this image? Thx.--Juandev (talk) 00:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

@Juandev: I have no clue. Why are you asking that to me ? I wasn't the uploader, was I ? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

And seemingly you are not admin, so you cannot have a look. --Juandev (talk) 09:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

@Juandev: Exactly. I remember that file, but I can't help you. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 10:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Nelson Mandela painted portrait P1040890.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi there, I'm using two pictures you've shared, they're called "Hypocrite "Love" message. Allegory of hypocrisy.", and "Sinceer "Hate" message. Allegory of sincerity.", on two articles on my blog : http://cwebfrance.free.fr/index.php/la-vengeance/ and http://cwebfrance.free.fr/index.php/blabla-du-mardi/

I've put the CC licence at the bottom with your nick. Thank you for your work.

Rafi Sionado —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 78.116.67.127 (talk) 16:37, 01 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Affiche Qu arrive t il a la peche-IMG 9656.JPG

Greetings,

you have put a "No Permission" tag on File:Affiche Qu arrive t il a la peche-IMG 9656.JPG, which I authored and licensed. I suppose that the underlying assumption is that the poster needs to be licensed, which I believe is debatable. I have taken the liberty to put up a deletion discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Affiche Qu arrive t il a la peche-IMG 9656.JPG to debate it.

Thank you. Rama (talk) 08:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Permission to use figure in a book.

Dear TwoWings,

I am working with Prof. Steven LaValle to help obtain permissions for borrowing figures or pictures in his upcoming book Virtual Reality, to be published by Cambridge University Press. The book is online here:

http://vr.cs.uiuc.edu/

We are hoping to include the picture of yours:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/Fantasmagorie_(Cohl).GIF/310px-Fantasmagorie_(Cohl).GIF

in this book (Chapter 1, Figure 1.25a).  Could we please have your permission for this?  Thank you.

You could also contact me at awarkoczewski at yahoo dot com.

Sincerely,

Adam Warkoczewski —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.8.94.183 (talk) 10:05, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello my friend

I don't not if you can remeber me.Mtr. I was a problem here in commons.Some user (with not very good intentions I believe make me in the pass a deletion request of alllll my drawings.Subsequently and in injust way an admin Jcb (talk) 19:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

deleted all, withoug any consensus.Do you have any idea that what can I do for resque my works?? It's was very absurd and injustice, so if you can help me take any recommendation I will be gratefull.Thank you very mutch.

Vicond (talk)

Commons:Illustrating Women, Filling the Gaps

Bonjour, Merci pour l'ajout de photos. Je suggère que l'on ne garde que les X dernières images de chaque catégorie, X étant à déterminer pour avoir un affichage optimal pour tout le monde. Qu'en penses-tu ? Yann (talk) 13:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Mais je ne sais pas comment retrouver les X dernières images. Une idée ? Yann (talk) 13:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Aucune idée. En revanche, je préconise qu'on en discute sur la pdd du Wikiprojet que tu as créée et qu'on le fasse en anglais, afin de gagner en visibilité vis-à-vis d'autres contributeurs-trices intéressé-e-s. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Oui, très bien. Yann (talk) 13:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Disabled artists

Chocolate pudding with a butterfly-shaped white chocolate deco on it.

Hi TwoWings; please help me find a cat for an artist (painter/photographer) who is hearing and speech impaired. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 14:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

@E4024: Apparently there's none. It has to be created. If you need help for that, please give me some details about what you need and give me a link of the files you want to categorize. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, TwoWings, I cooked this pudding for you. Do you think we can "invent" a cat for butterfly-shaped food or food decoration, something? --E4024 (talk) 14:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. I couldn't find it. --E4024 (talk) 15:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Usine Claude et Duval

Je ne comprends pas pourquoi vous avez proposé la suppression de mes photos des terrasses de l'Usine Claude-et-Duval. C'est un travail personnel réalisé lors d'une visite guidée du bâtiment durant laquelle la prise de vue était expressément autorisée par le propriétaire des lieux. Cordialement. Jihelpé

@Jihelpé: Vous confondez plusieurs choses : 1) le fait que vous êtes l'auteur des photos ; 2) l'autorisation de prendre des photos sur les lieux ; 3) le droit d'exploiter librement des clichés (même personnels) d'un tel lieu - c'est ce point que vous oubliez ou méconnaissez.

Le bâtiment dont il est question est une architecture récente (=auteur vivant ou mort depuis moins de 70 ans) et donc, très probablement, protégée par un droit d'auteur (le-s architecte-s), au même titre que n'importe quelle oeuvre d'esprit. Ainsi, vous ne pouvez pas en exploiter librement l'image car votre photo est ce qu'on appelle une "oeuvre dérivée" (pour les expressions entre guillemets, voir les liens proposés à la fin de mon message pour des explications détaillées). Pour qu'elle soit acceptable sur Commons, vous devez donc apporter la preuve soit qu'il n'y a pas de protection pour le bâtiment concerné, soit que vous avez obtenu le droit d'exploiter librement votre photo auprès des ayants droits (ce qui n'est généralement pas facile !). D'autre part, il faut tenir compte du pays dans lequel la photo est prise : en l'occurrence, il n'existe pas, en France, de "droit de panorama" (=droit d'exploiter librement une photo personnelle d'une oeuvre visible depuis l'espace public) et on ne peut donc conserver une photo d'un tel bâtiment que s'il est "de minimis" (=il apparaît sur un cliché dont il n'est pas le sujet principal) ou si l'on peut raisonnablement considérer que le "seuil d'originalité" n'est pas franchi (ce qui peut malheureusement être un peu subjectif !).

Pour plus d'explications, je vous conseille donc vivement, afin de mieux contribuer à Wikimedia Commons, de lire les pages suivantes :

• Commons:À propos des licences
• Commons:Œuvre dérivée
• Commons:Freedom of panorama/fr
• Commons:De minimis/fr
• Commons:Threshold of originality (page non traduite en français : voir aussi l'article francophone de Wikipédia : Seuil d'originalité)
• et éventuellement Commons:Copyright rules by territory (page non traduite en français)

Cordialement --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

bonjour TwoWings, Merci pour vos precisions. Je crains qu'il ne faille dans ces conditions faire disparaître de Wiki toutes les autres photos des bâtiments de Le Corbusier. Bon courage. Bien cordialement Jihelpé

@Jihelpé: Non, pas toutes. Car, comme dit plus haut, cela dépend des pays. Or, des pays comme l'Allemagne, la Suisse ou l'Inde (où il existe des oeuvres de Le Corbusier) autorisent la liberté de panorama (NB : c'est le sens de "FoP" - pour "Freedom of panorama" - que j'avais indiqué dans les procédures de suppression de vos photos). Donc des photos de ces bâtiments peuvent être proposées sur Commons. Mais pas les oeuvres présentes en France, sauf dans les cas limites indiqués plus haut. Par exemple, cette photo est acceptable car la structure en elle-même ne représente qu'une partie minoritaire de la photo. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Using your image (Car in Oradour-sur-Glane4.jpg) as a cover image for a book

Hello, I work for an academic publisher in the UK, and we would like to use your image Car in Oradour-sur-Glane4.jpg as the cover image for a book we are publishing later this year, titled Landscapes of Memory: Trauma, Space, History by Patrizia Violi. I am letting you know as per your request on the image page - if you could send a short email to l.shanahanpeterlang.com confirming that you give your permission for the image to be used on the cover of the book, it would be appreciated. Thanks!

Panoramio bot operator

I opened a complaint about User:Shizhao and his Panoramio uploads at the Administrators' noticeboard. You are invited to share your personal experience and opinion about this user and his abuse of his bot operator rights. Thanks, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 352.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 352.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saadbl (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 352.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 352.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saadbl (talk) 13:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

File:ErosPyramide20090221 439a.jpg

File:ErosPyramide20090221 439a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Saadbl (talk) 12:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

File:LBourgoin2-Le Petit Nicolas-Avant Première.jpg

File:LBourgoin2-Le Petit Nicolas-Avant Première.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Olybrius (talk) 13:13, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:BNoël-Bruneau and MJCroze 2004.JPG

And also:

• File:Bertille Noël-Bruneau + Marie-Josée Croze 2004.JPG
• File:MJCroze.jpg

Yours sincerely, AntonierCH ^(d) 21:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Amália Rodrigues - Metro station Aeroporto (Lisboa).jpg

I marked this as a copyvio because I was seemingly confused (or just not up to date) about FoP cases in my own country. I’m glad it was undeleted. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 21:35, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

File:'Final Straw- Food, Earth, Happiness' tour poster.jpg

Hi! I'm the author of the work, and copyright holder.

I've released the poster (and many other images) on the film's website under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license here: http://www.finalstraw.org/kit/.

Also, I've sent a release to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Will this be enough? Thank you!

-Patrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmlydon (talk • contribs) 19:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)