User talk:Cirt

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

• Commons:Announcements
• COM:A/RV, COM:FPC, COM:DEL (Current/Older), COM:CFD, Commons:Flickr images/reviewers, Category:Flickr images needing human review, Category:Problem tags, Special:NewPages, Special:NewImages, Category:Non-empty category redirects, User:CommonsDelinker/commands, User:Kanonkas/Tools, CAT:CV, Special:AbuseFilter
• Useful: {{subst:npd}}, OTRS Pending, OTRS Pending (en.wiki), OTRS Wiki, OTRS queues
• Basic upload form, Upload derivative of Commons, Flinfo tool, flickr2commons tool/bryan flickr tool, Flickr free-use search
• Commons:Message templates
• Template:How to transfer (helpful example at File:Plympton BW.jpg), and Commons Helper
• {{En main page}}
• newfiles autoupdate tool
• User:CommonsDelinker/commands
• Commons:Universal Subtitles
• Commons:Chunked uploads
• Commons:VicuñaUploader
• Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Backlog

Category:Videos of sexuality by format

Category:Videos of sexuality by format has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--grendel|khan 00:25, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:Videos of male masturbation by format

Category:Videos of male masturbation by format has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--grendel|khan 00:46, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:1930s videos of ejaculation

Category:1930s videos of ejaculation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--grendel|khan 00:16, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:1920s videos of ejaculation

Category:1920s videos of ejaculation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--grendel|khan 07:52, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

ANU

Hello, I just notify you that. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:57, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

File:I ate Mr Hankey by Kenny Lex.jpg

File:I ate Mr Hankey by Kenny Lex.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mr. Guye (talk) 02:54, 6 May 2017 (UTC)