Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Nude jockey girl.jpg

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:Nude_jockey_girl.jpg

This image seems to be out of the project's scope. ALE! ¿…? 22:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Illustrates fetish clothing & accessories and also an aspect of fetish sexuality. Potentially useful. --Simonxag 02:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep I don't see any problem with that picture. For instance it can illustrate the fact that some people like to be nude at home. This picture is not pornographic. Commons should also accept some artistic pictures. This shot is no more useless than many paintings available on the site. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:25, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

 Comment Should we deleted that as well? Or that? Come on! Nude pictures, as long as they're not pornographic, can have an artistic value. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment Might be used to illustrate an article about sexual festish, though I'm a bit dubious about it. The absence of a model release bothers me. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Do you really think the picture has been taken (and shown on Flickr) without the knowledge of the model? And why is it suddenly a problem here and not for maybe 95% of the pictures of people on Commons? I know it's not an argument. That should mean most of the pictures of people should be deleted if they don't have an explicit authorization. But why is it suddenly a problem NOW and on this kind of picture? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Knowledge and acceptance of a wide diffusion are two whole different things. Why do you think photo magazines insist on having model releases for posed pictures? Of course the problem of model release is more critical when nude pictures are concerned. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Then let's delete all nude pictures on Commons since none (or maybe just a few) have authorizations. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep A pretty nice picture ;) Elektron 09:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete As this is a private place and there is a normal expectation of privacy, the subject's permission should be obtained per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. Since no permission is given, this should be deleted. --MichaelMaggs 22:33, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

•  Comment The author of the photography is apparently a quite famous Dutch artist called Peter Klashorst. Therefore, the potential of this picture is also to illustrate his work. I hope some people will understand that! --86.67.47.175 20:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep No reason to delete. "Wikimedia Commons is a freely licensed media file repository (similar to stock photography archives) targeted at other Wikimedia projects.". Also, please keep in mind that Commons is used to feed Wikimedia projects, not only Wikipedia. I can easily imagine how these images could be used on the photography wikibook. Rama 09:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

---

Keep. Well within Project Scope of a free image repository as asserted above. Privacy isn't an issue as photo was taken by a famous artist to be published publicly. It is already posted publicly on flickr. If he (the artist) is posting it on flickr with a free license we should be really thanking him. -- Cat ^ちぃ？ 17:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)