User talk:GeorgHH

Inconsistency in description of Category:Swarovski

Hi. I'm trying to resolve an inconsistency between the English and German language descriptions of Category:Swarovski, whereby the German description says it is an Austrian company, whilst the English description says that it is a Swiss company. Looking at the history of the category, it looks like it was created by you with that inconsistency already in place. If you can help, please go to Category talk:Swarovski#Swiss?. TIA -- Chris j wood (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Kategorien redirekts

Hallo. Ich bin auf deine Seite gestossen, weil du vor Jahren ein redirekt der Kategorie Pelikan gemacht hast. Wenn ich deine Benutzerseite richtig verstehe, kategorisierst du, was ich auch oft mache. Daher meine Frage an dich: Gibt es eine Diskussionsseite wo allgemein über Sinn und Unsinn von Redirekts gesprochen wird? Im konkreten Fall führt der redirekt des deutschen Wortes Pelikan zu Category:Pelikan (company) mit dem hübschen Ergebnis, dass deutschsprachige Benutzer dort das Tier Pelikan einordnen, statt unter Category:Pelecanidae. Ein ähnlicher Fall scheint aktuell Category:Bows (Bogen zum Schießen, Geigenbögen). Ich weiss nicht, wie man das lösen kann, denn ich habe keine Ahnung wie Homonymkategorien funktionnieren, wenn einem automatisch Kategorievorschläge beim Hochladen gemacht werden. Die Umleitung zum exakten Kategorienamen ist automatisch, so dass man nicht unbedingt merkt, dass es die falsche Kategorie ist. Dazu kommt das Sprachproblem (wie heißt der Pelikan auf Latein, der Geigenbogen auf Englisch? Hast du eine Idee oder den Link zur besten Stelle so etwas zu diskutieren? Gruss Traumrune (talk) 13:29, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Traumrune, eine spezielle Seite zum diskutieren von redirects kenne ich nicht. Geeignet scheinen mir die Diskussionsseiten Template talk:Category redirect oder Commons talk:Naming categories. Besser wäre aber wohl Commons:Village pump, da dort mehr Leute aktiv an den Diskussionen teilnehmen.
Ich selbst würde aus Category:Pelikan mittels {{Disambig}} eine Begriffsklärungsseite machen, die dann auf die richtigen Kategorien verlinkt.
--GeorgHH • talk   10:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Ein Dankeschön

Hallo GeorgHH,

Wir haben eines deiner Bilder, in einen Artikel für das Hurraki Tagebuch, genutzt. Vielen Dank Dir hierfür.

Grüße

De-adminship warning

Dear GeorgHH. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2013 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 07:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Files_by_User:172_from_en.wikipedia

Category:Files_by_User:172_from_en.wikipedia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 16:19, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/GeorgHH⧽: العربية, български, Deutsch, English, ‎français, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎മലയാളം, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska, اردو, 中文

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 7 February 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/GeorgHH⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear GeorgHH,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kubischer Kanonenschlag.jpg

--  Gazebo (talk) 14:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Isaac_Arnault

Category:Isaac_Arnault has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

gpesenti (talk) 18:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Foto Mojo Club

Hallo Georg HH, würde gerne dein foto vom mojo club/ bowlingbhan-gebäude für eine non-profit-publikation verwenden. ist das möglich und unter welchen bedingungen? antwort bitte an info@drjoergschilling.de

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Hamburg Einkaufszentrum Hamburger Straße.jpg

Yours sincerely, Krd 05:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Hamburg Barkasse HVV 001.jpg

File:Hamburg Barkasse HVV 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

188.96.37.3 02:17, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

File:FotO LewisClark statue.jpg

File:FotO LewisClark statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kelly (talk) 21:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:Botanical_Garden,_Rio_de_Janeiro

Category:Botanical_Garden,_Rio_de_Janeiro has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Arnaud Palastowicz (talk) 18:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Rote Flora 2006.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Rote Flora 2006.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rote Flora 2006.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Jcb (talk) 17:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Lizenzierung und Genehmigung File:ML-01 R0028230 r...‬

Goodevening Mr. Georg,

I don't know if this is the correct way to contact you. I tried to understand where to contact you about the subject. I wish to say that for me was easier to send to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org the rows where the company authorize me to publish that photo. Now I'm giving an extract of that mail here below:

---

To: andrea.cala Cc: Subject: Fwd: 【2/19転送】 Message from andreas Cala Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 13:18:48 +0100

Dear Mr Cala,

Thank you for your kind EMail. I hope my answer is not too late.

Please find here enclosed a picture of ML-01 Si-Pyranometer. I hope they correspond to what you are looking for.

Thank you for your efforts.

Best regards from EKO,

Nicolas Jalby

++ Nicolas Jalby Sales Manager

EKO INSTRUMENTS Europe B.V. Lulofsstraat 55 - Unit 32 2521 AL Den Haag The Netherlands

Tel: +31 (0)70 3885521 GSM: +31(0)6 28838831 Skype: nicolas.eko Web: www.eko-eu.com

Sign up for our free newsletter : http://eko-eu.com/news-and-events/newsletter

Begin forwarded message:

From: EKO info [1] Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 4:18 PM To: Toshikazu Hasegawa Cc: Asami Yamamoto; Chiaki Kato; Kondo Satoshi; Makoto Shiobara; Miki Fukawa; Osamu Sakamoto; Toshio Ohkubo; Tsukasa Kobashi; Yuka Yamazaki; Yuko Hirano Subject: 【2/19転送】 Message from andreas Cala

【2/19転送】山本

From: EKO Instruments Japan [2] Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 3:45 PM To: andreas Cala Subject: [SPAM] Message from andreas Cala

Name: andreas Cala Company: z Country: Italy Email: xxxxxxxxxxxxx Phone number: 02123 Please contact via -: Email Contact head office: EKO Japan Request: Information Message: Goodmorning Sirs, I'm widening italian wikipedia dictionary on pyranometers and I would like to add photo of your product ML-01 Si as an example of Si-Pyranometer, as my collegue has done for a thermopile pyranometer with another company product's. Note that we'll be able to insert photo, model type (ML-01..) but NOT company name. We'll consider negation of my request if you'll not answer in four days. B.R. A. Cala

---

As you can see all the company agree (and is glad) to have photo of one of their product on wikipedia. I hope that is more than enough.

My Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthurcala (talk • contribs) 20:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kids Lift Men (22619102077).jpg

Hi, This is perfectly fine. I don't understand why you nominate this. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:44, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Moin, it's fine, yes. But I can't see a realistic use for it. What do you think it is useful for? --GeorgHH • talk   13:17, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Files in Category:Werner_Meier

All files are selfmade and uploaded on request of the artist. I know him personaly. --Netpilots (talk) 14:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Drepaniten

Category:Drepaniten has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:53, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Sparhümpchen.jpg

File:Sparhümpchen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 14:07, 30 April 2017 (UTC)