Commons:Deletion requests/File:ViceIllustration.jpg
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:ViceIllustration.jpg[edit]
Personal art work. Orphaned, low quality, non-educational in use, out of scope. Missvain (talk) 22:37, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Keep Orphaned? - it's categorized, it doesn't happen to be in use at the moment. Low quality? - it's a reasonable bit of illustrative artwork that could be used in banners and the like to suggest the subject matter, it's hardly a doodle. Non-educational? - most of our images are not in themselves educational, they are however used in various ways in educational projects. The availability of artwork adds extra choices to an editor producing a page and artwork on most subjects tends to be in short supply. "Personal artwork" is supposed to be deleted on the same basis as personal photographs (it's of no interest or use to anyone but its creator), the rule is not there to purge artwork from the Commons. --Simonxag (talk) 23:13, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, I don't see possible educational use either Jcb (talk) 13:29, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
