Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tickle torture.jpg

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tickle_torture.jpg

Not the uploader Sdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsfsdwrwerwerwerwerwer own work. Preview image of some porn/fetish movie grabbed from the internet and uploaded by the user a few minutes after account creation. Copyvio. Martin H. (talk) 15:43, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

 Keep  Delete No evidence for this claim whatsoever. "Some porn/fetish movie" - what movie? Where? It is the user's sole upload, but wanting anonymity over the production of a photo of a BDSM game is hardly surprising. The photo is heavily used and so useful. --Simonxag (talk) 17:08, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

• • It is an empty room, its two female and it uses an electrict interdental brush. Its all the same as in realtickling.com [1][2] without having watched all the 1000s of clips, only a few hundred preview pages. Even the carpet in that room looks the same. Ok, all this similarities are not that big problem, but its a video screenshot, that simply does it. And it was uploaded in a phase with many copyvio uploads in tickling articles by another en.wp user. --Martin H. (talk) 19:58, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
    • Empty room - would you expect Grand Central Station? 2 females? - impossible to tell and irrelevant (only 4 combinations possible). Electric toothbrush - pretty much standard. That said, the flooring does look remarkably similar to the realtickling.com venue's: it doesn't prove the places are the same and any way this is an event at a play party, held somewhere they allow such things, have some fixed equipment and maybe host other sorts of activities. Dodgy uploads by another user are irrelevant unless you can show a link. Thinking about it, the combination of no Exif data (for privacy?) and the original shot having the model's face visible is a bit worrying. What concrete evidence do you have that this is a screen shot? --Simonxag (talk) 21:13, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
      • The black bars at the left and the right side. The jpg artifacts. --Martin H. (talk) 21:55, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
        • The artifacts might just be from a poor quality camera, but the bars are suspicious. Even if it's a screenshot it might be from a video taken by the uploader. I'm switching my vote to delete as there's grounds for suspicion. --Simonxag (talk) 23:19, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

---

Deleted. Jcb (talk) 22:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)