Commons:Deletion requests/File:Phonesex.gif

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Phonesex.gif

this seems like graffiti on toilet wall, no educational use Jugydmort (talk) 16:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

•  Keep - In use on nl.wp, therefore in scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

  Maybe better not to have any image than it? (If we really need illustration, we could seek something better) --Jugydmort (talk) 19:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

  It is not for Commons to tell other projects what they should or should not use in their articles. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

•  Keep - Appalling quality, but in use. Hopefully it will be replaced by something better, but even then it should be kept as having been used. It could still be used to illustrate childish sex drawings. --Simonxag (talk) 20:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

  Sorry Simon, but we don't keep stuff on the grounds that it could be used to illustrate bad photography, we shouldn't do the same for drawings. That it's in use is enough. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Anyway, due to MediaWiki idiosyncrasies in resizing transparent GIFs, it's not too useful except at full (unresized) resolution, and should probably be replaced by the SVG (not nominated for deletion). AnonMoos (talk) 13:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

P.S. Previous discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Low-quality sex drawings... -- AnonMoos (talk) 13:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

---

Kept: Still in use on nlwiki over a month later. Clearly therefore in scope. --Storkk (talk) 09:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)